It seems like the speaker has some skepticism about Robin’s intentions and timing regarding his return to the firm, especially around the sudden death of Leland and the selection process for a new managing partner. They highlight that Robin claims he came back to support the firm, particularly Andy, during the transition period, but the speaker feels his story is questionable. The timeline, for instance, doesn’t quite add up for them—Leland’s death happened a while ago, yet Robin returned much later. This delay raises doubts about whether he truly rushed back for the reasons he states, or if he’s there for different motives.
The speaker also mentions Robin’s careful and well-prepared responses, which feel too convenient, sparking speculation that he might be hiding something. Additionally, Fatima is said to be keeping an eye on Hayden to protect Andy’s interests, a plan that Robin validates. But the speaker points out that if Hayden, who specializes in tax law, can manage both his and Andy’s caseloads effectively, it could make him look like the stronger candidate for managing partner.
Lastly, the speaker finds Hudson’s critiques of Andy noteworthy—he argues that Andy often avoids repercussions in scandals while others suffer, a perspective that adds depth to his character, even though he’s often portrayed as a nuisance. It’s an interesting contrast that makes viewers question if there’s a broader scheme happening in the background and if Robin’s intentions are truly as noble as he claims.
What do you think of Robin’s intentions? Do you think he has an ulterior motive, or is he genuinely back to support Andy?
